PRECURSORS OF CANCERISM

The figures presented here can be regarded as precursors of Cancerism in different degrees. Some anticipated major elements of the theory; others expressed only particular ideas, intuitions or analogies that would later be incorporated and developed within the Cancerist framework. None of them formulated Cancerism as a complete theory.

They came from philosophy, literature, medicine, anthropology, biology, ecology and the study of civilization. Some questioned humanity’s anomalous position within nature. Some identified human intelligence or consciousness as a possible evolutionary problem. Others examined population growth, technological expansion, ecological domination or the progressive destruction of the biosphere. A few explicitly compared humanity with cancer.

Taken separately, these ideas represent fragments of a much larger problem. Cancerism attempts to bring them together within a unified interpretation of humanity as a species whose exceptional evolutionary development has allowed it to escape many natural constraints and progressively behave, within the biosphere, in ways structurally comparable to malignant disease.

The pages below present selected texts, ideas and arguments from these authors, together with an explanation of their affinities — and, where necessary, their differences — with Cancerism.

1584 — Giordano Bruno

1762 — Jean-Jacques Rousseau

1808 — Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

1864 — Fyodor Dostoevsky

1873 — Friedrich Nietzsche

1933 — Peter Wessel Zapffe

1954 — Alan Gregg

1964 — Jean Servier

1967 — Arthur Koestler

1973 — Emil Cioran

1980 — Aurelio Peccei

1987 — Jared Diamond

1989 — Warren M. Hern

1992 — Frank Forencich

1996 — Allan Kent MacDougall

1999 — Daniel R. Wilson

2000 — Claude Lévi-Strauss

2010 — John Zerzan

2010 — Thomas Ligotti

2012 — Dennis Meadows

2012 — Rutilio Sermonti

2014 — Daniel Pauly

2020 — Philippe Descola